Posted by on May 3, 2021 2:46 pm
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Top Page Links

By Haig Simonian, Avenir Suisse

By Haig Simonian, Avenir Suisse

 

Hindsight, it is said, offers 20:20 vision. With the Coronavirus pandemic now into its second year, experts and governments around the world have become much savvier about how to deal with an international health crisis.

 

If that knowledge could be harnessed to tackle the next pandemic – which many scientists and health experts believe is inevitable – then the suffering and deaths linked to Covid-19 would not entirely have been in vain.

 

Paramount are the tools that stretched public administrations could use to cope better in future. That was the focus of a special recent Avenir Suisse evening event devoted to discussing a larger role for the private sector in a future outbreak.

 

Drawing on experience from politics and business, two Avenir Suisse moderators concentrated discussion not so much on the mistakes made, such as an inadequate start, ineffective contact tracing and tardy inoculation, as on the lessons to be learned.

The limitations of the public sector

 

All four participants: Petra Gössi, chair of the liberal Free Democratic Party; Pierre Alain Schnegg, health director of the canton of Bern and a former entrepreneur; Philip Mosimann, a prominent industrialist; and Andrin Oswald, a former head of vaccines at pharmaceuticals group Novartis, were unanimous that tackling future pandemics would be eased by better public-private cooperation.

 

All noted the public sector’s proclivity to avoid risk and proceed deliberately, even when a national health crisis called for expeditious decisions and even an element of risk taking. “In a crisis, you can’t use the same processes as in normal times,” stressed Schnegg, a member of the conservative Swiss People’s Party whose relative success tackling Covid in his home canton has been widely noted.

 

That meant swift decision making and execution, as well as a readiness to acknowledge mistakes and change course rapidly if necessary. Such thinking, he suggested, was not endemic to the somewhat bureaucratic, perfectionist Swiss bureaucracy.

 

A need to deploy the best talent, either from within or outside the public administration, was another crucial element for the panelists. “The key fact is that it has to function,” observed Gössi, when asked about outsourcing. In a crisis, politics and ideology should take second place to speed and effectiveness, she reasoned.

 

Tuesday for Future, April 20, 2021, with Jérôme Cosandey, Jürg Müller, Pierre Alain Schnegg, Philip Mosimann, Petra Gössi and Andrin Oswald (front to back).

 

Blinkered judgement

 

Oswald, a medical doctor by training whose career has spanned the private sector and non-profit organizations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, emphasized the need for mutual understanding. Like others, he noted how few Swiss bureaucrats or even politicians could look back on active experience within the private sector, having often made their careers through the public administration. That lack of interaction encouraged silo thinking and impeded the quest for broader solutions. Schnegg noted how he had turned to specialists as diverse as event organizers – whose expertise in quickly arranging and then dismantling functions proved highly valuable – to expedite his canton’s awareness and inoculation campaign.

Federalism as a barrier?

 

While panelists lauded Switzerland’s small size, relatively relaxed interpersonal culture and general accessibility of senior officials, they agreed the country’s often praised extreme federalism could prove an impediment in a national emergency.

 

“Our system is not up to dealing with crises,” said Mosimann, a self-confessed federalist. Stressing the need for civil servants to adapt, “they lack the preparation,” he added. Unnecessary duplication, with, for example, 26 cantons all taking separate approaches on contact tracing, wasted valuable time and resources.

 

All criticized Switzerland as a laggard in digitization, compared with many other advanced economies. The pandemic had exposed particular deficiencies in health care. Digital patient records had been a subject of discussion for years, but with little progress, bemoaned Gössi.

 

And while all acknowledged the importance of data protection and the defense of privacy, they agreed that such concerns could go too far and hinder progress. Mosimann noted the multiple forms he had been required to complete on a one-off business trip to the Netherlands – all of which might end up gathering dust in some distant office. “All that information could have been read electronically at a stroke from my frequent flyer card,” he mused.

 

It may be months, or even years, until Switzerland digests all the lessons of the pandemic. But if the crisis helps to broaden thinking and, especially, to accelerate digitization in the public sector, then some good may yet have flowed out of all the suffering.

 


Haig Simonian. Before his posting to Zurich, Haig Simonian was the Financial Times’ chief German correspondent. His journalistic career began at The Economist in 1984. Today he is a well known freelancer writer, broadcaster and moderator of business events.